Recently, USA Pickleball made waves in the community with the addition of the PBCor Test, impacting Ronbus Ripple paddles. Learn more about the controversy and user reactions below.
Summary
- The introduction of the PBCor Test has stirred up controversy in the pickleball community
- Users question the retroactive implementation of the test and its impact on manufacturers
- Concerns arise regarding the sudden delisting of Ronbus Ripple paddles and the testing procedures
Community Discontent
One user, Quintaton_16, expressed confusion over the application of the CoR test to established paddles, questioning the validity of the delisting process. They raised concerns about USAPA’s testing protocols and the implications of the sudden decision to revoke approval.
Manufacturer Woes
Maxgeek highlighted the challenges faced by manufacturers due to the retroactive nature of the test, raising valid points about the impact on both producers and consumers. The uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of the new test adds to the frustration within the community
Potential Ramifications
The implementation of the PBCor Test has left many questions unanswered, leading to speculation about the fairness and transparency of the decision-making process. The controversy surrounding Ronbus Ripple paddles serves as a catalyst for discussions on regulatory practices within the sport