The debate surrounding the improvement of VAR in the Premier League has sparked a myriad of suggestions from fans…
Summary
- Fans propose using virtual referees from abroad to enhance VAR decisions.
- Proposal suggests employing a committee of 10-20 virtual referees for unbiased input.
- Limiting VAR reviews to full-speed videos is favored for factual offenses.
- Some suggest making VAR the main referee to ensure accuracy and consistency.
Fans Weigh In
Kezmangotagoal expresses concern over delays in decisions due to a 10-20 person committee, advocating for VAR use only on factual offenses.
Aggresively_punctual suggests limiting VAR reviews to full-speed videos for clear and obvious errors, emphasizing the importance of on-field referee judgments for close calls.
Alternate Suggestions
Techman710 argues for separate VAR officials due to differing skill sets from on-field referees and potential biases among referee colleagues.
Dennis3282 proposes making VAR the main referee to leverage its superior vantage point and eliminate errors made by on-field officials.
The Cost Conundrum
Alone_Consideration6 raises concerns about the financial implications of implementing a 10-20 member committee, particularly on days with fewer matches.
Meth_Hardy suggests training individuals exclusively as VAR officials to ensure specialization and efficiency in decision-making.