The Oakland Athletics have stirred up a storm of controversy by planning to play nearly 10% of their future home games away from their new Las Vegas stadium. Athletics president Dave Kaval believes neutral site games will help build the team’s brand and attract new players and sponsors.
Summary
- Playing games away may damage the team’s connection with the local fanbase.
- Fans are concerned about the impact on players’ rest and performance.
- Skeptical comments highlight the potential risks and downsides of this decision.
Controversy and Concern
Some fans express disappointment with the Athletics’ decision, feeling that it may weaken the team’s ties with the community and disrupt players’ routines. One user commented, ‘So… 8 extra games a year where your players don’t get to sleep in their beds and a few extra travel days.’
Frustration and Skepticism
Other comments express frustration and skepticism towards the ownership’s motives and decisions. A fan stated, ‘Either commit to Las Vegas, or stfu. Trotting out no names is great, especially on a terrible team.’ Concerns about the team’s management and strategic direction are also prevalent.
Fan Outrage and Disapproval
There is a sense of fan outrage and disapproval towards the Athletics’ choice to play home games away from their primary stadium. One user expressed, ‘Hope baseball fans boycott the A’s if they travel. Sucks for the players, but screw the owners’.
Amidst the heated discussions on Reddit, the Athletics’ decision continues to divide opinions among fans and observers. The potential implications of this unconventional strategy on the team’s performance, fan base, and brand remain subjects of intense debate.