Mark Stone Injury Controversy: Legitimate or Suspicious?

by

NebraskaAvenue’s post refers to the potential controversy surrounding Mark Stone’s injury and quick return to practice, prompting discussions among fans.

[Seravalli] Huge eye roll here. I’ve reported all along that the lacerated spleen is a legitimate, serious injury. There’s been no shenanigans. But man, Stone coming back to practice for second year in a row one week before playoffs is some seriously fortuitous timing.
byu/NebraskaAvenue inhockey

Summary

  • Is Mark Stone’s injury as serious as reported, or are there potential shenanigans involved?
  • Some fans question the timing of Stone returning to practice just before the playoffs for the second consecutive year.
  • Debates revolve around the legitimacy of Vegas’ management of Stone’s injuries and playing time.

Tension in Stone’s Injury

While some users believe Stone’s injury is legitimate, others express doubts about the timing of his return.

Skepticism on Vegas’ Handling

Fans question whether Vegas would handle Stone’s injuries differently if in a more crucial situation.

Expectations for Playoffs

Concerns arise about how Stone’s injury history could impact his performance in the upcoming playoffs.