Novak Djokovic’s incredible feat of winning four consecutive Grand Slams in three different surfaces is under scrutiny in the tennis world.
Summary
- Novak Djokovic’s four consecutive Grand Slam wins are debated for their significance in tennis history.
- Some argue that Djokovic’s feat is more impressive than a calendar slam due to the variety of surfaces.
- There is admiration for Djokovic’s athleticism and impact on the sport.
- Opinions vary on whether Djokovic should have achieved a calendar slam.
YouNeedThesaurus
I was going to complain about ‘still’ – cause it only happened like last year. But no, it was 8 years ago.
Roy1984
That record is so underestimated. It has even more weight than the calendar slam which Rod Laver won since then 3 slams were on grass and one on clay, there wasn’t a hard court on slams in 1969.
csriram
2015 Wimbledon, 2015 US Open, 2016 AO, 2016 French for 4 in a row, is that what this is talking about?
Aceh40
I am not a Djokovic fan, but winning four consecutive slams in a 12 month period should count as a GS. Who cares that he did not start in Australia…
What he and Serena did was as great of achievement as Graf’s and Laver’s.
Overratedluka
I will always be a fan of Roger WAY above Novak and Nadal but I have no bad feelings about any of them. But I am glad one of them ended up as the clear undisputed GOAT so we don’t have to have to regurgitate the same arguments for the rest of our lives
RacketMask
Can you believe that he hasn’t gotten a calendar slam – and has been 1 away 4 times
I wonder if it is the one thing he regrets never getting before 2025
Caregiver_Most
What an athlete man….his greatness will be deeply missed when he retires
Quiet-Now
Novak is the GOAT
MoonriseTurtle
2021 was so close
schak27
the perfect tennis player