Tennis fans debate whether injury-free Del Potro could have had a better career than Murray. Some argue Del Potro’s weapons and style could have led to more success.
Summary
- Del Potro’s unique playing style raises questions about his potential success compared to Murray.
- Debate centers on Del Potro’s ability to challenge the ‘big 3′ and impact other players’ success.
- Fans speculate on whether Del Potro could have won more slams if not for injuries.
- Uncertainty remains as fans weigh hypothetical scenarios and player matchups.
Del Potro’s Style and Potential
Tennis enthusiasts highlight Del Potro’s towering height, powerful forehand, and versatile skills that differentiated him from Murray. His ability to reach grand slam finals with a limited backhand raised intriguing possibilities for his career trajectory.
Impact on the ‘Big 3’ Dominance
Some comments suggest that Del Potro could have posed a more significant challenge to the dominant ‘big 3’ in tennis, potentially disrupting their success and opening doors for other players.
Speculative Scenarios and Counterfactuals
Fans engage in speculative discussions about the alternate timelines where Del Potro remained injury-free, contemplating the potential shift in grand slam outcomes and overall tennis landscape.
The deliberations among fans reflect the enduring fascination with what-ifs and the complexities of predicting players’ careers in a competitive sport like tennis.