Players continue to debate the durability of the 6.0 Ruby paddle, with some questioning if their warranty claims should be covered.
Summary
- Normal wear and tear or warrantable damage?
- Understanding the nature of Kevlar material
- Insight on proper paddle care
- When to submit warranty claims
Reactions from the Community
Many users believe the damage is a result of normal wear and tear, suggesting proper paddle usage and care. Some emphasize the characteristics of Kevlar and its role in paddle construction. However, concerns still arise regarding warranty coverage, prompting discussions on warranty terms and claim validity.
Expert Opinions
One user highlights the misconception around Kevlar, clarifying its purpose in paddle design. Another advises against using certain cleaning methods that may exacerbate paddle damage. The discussion widens to include queries on dead spots in paddles and their warranty eligibility, unveiling varying perceptions within the community.
Community Engagement
While responses differ on warranty coverage, the community showcases a collective understanding of paddle maintenance and material properties. Through shared experiences and insights, players navigate the fine line between normal wear and tear and warrantable defects, shedding light on proper paddle upkeep and warranty considerations.