Some of these stats are getting ridiculous, at what point will the stat be ‘the first man at this height to win 12 points in 12 tournaments wearing pink’. Like c’mon, this second stat is just so niche.
Summary
- Fans feel tennis stats have become overly niche, losing their meaning in the age of data analysis.
- Stats are seen as information overload used to hype top players, generating interest but with many meaningless pieces of information.
- Some users acknowledge the achievements behind the stats, appreciating the accomplishments of players.
Criticism of Niche Stats
Some fans express frustration with stats becoming too specific, like noting a player being the 4th person under 23 to win 3 titles in 3 months. They consider such information as ‘moronic’ and unnecessary.
Backlash Against Meaningless Stats
Others critique the constant bombardment of stats by tournament organizers to promote top players, leading to what they perceive as overloaded and insignificant data.
Appreciation for Player Achievements
Conversely, some fans appreciate the skill and dedication required for players to achieve milestones like winning 3 titles in 3 months, especially at a young age.
The debate over tennis stats ranging from excessive to admirable continues among fans, with differing views on the relevance and impact of such detailed data.