Reddit user Mets1st asked the community if Kirkland golf balls perform as well as Titleist Pro V-1 in water and woods. Let’s see what golfers shared:
Summary
- Kirkland golf balls offer visibility advantages but may not float as well as Pro V-1.
- Users find Kirkland balls to be cost-effective and resilient, suitable for specific shots.
- Some players note reduced distance with Kirkland compared to Pro V-1.
- There are mixed opinions on the overall feel and performance of Kirkland balls.
Fluorescent Visibility
Reddit user sjrthethird points out that the fluorescent Kirkland balls provide better visibility compared to other brands, aiding in keeping track of the ball’s location even in challenging environments.
Cost-Effective Resilience
Golfer bionicbhangra shares a positive experience with Kirkland balls, noting their affordability, distance coverage, and green-stopping capabilities, contrary to perceptions of them feeling like rocks.
Distance and Performance
While some users, like ravnsulter, express a preference for the unique feeling of hitting Pro V-1 into water, others like traypo describe a minor distance issue with Kirkland balls on forced carries and narrow fairways.
Reddit user Fratguy20 mentions a personal preference for Pro V-1 over Kirkland balls due to the latter’s perceived differences in performance.
Final Thoughts
In the battle of golf balls, it seems Kirkland is holding its ground as a viable alternative to renowned brands. Whether it’s for visibility, affordability, or performance quirks, golfers’ opinions on Kirkland balls showcase a diverse range of experiences and preferences. While the debate continues, one thing is clear – the golfing community values both tradition and innovation in their choice of equipment.