Andy Murray’s ranking as the 80th athlete on ESPN’s top 100 list of the 21st century has sparked a heated debate among fans. While some acknowledge his accomplishments, others express disbelief and critique the rankings.
Summary
- Users question the absence of cricket stars in the list.
- Disagreement arises over Murray ranking above Venus Williams and Ronaldo.
- Criticism of ESPN’s emphasis on American sports and basketball.
- Speculation and sarcasm surface regarding potential top rankings.
Debate Over Rankings
One user criticizes the extensive presence of WNBA players on the list, attributing it to American bias. They express surprise at the absence of cricket stars, highlighting the sport’s global popularity.
Disbelief and Comparison
Users express disbelief at Murray’s ranking above renowned athletes like Venus Williams and Ronaldo. The mention of other athletes like Virat Kohli and Mbappe generates further debate over perceived superiority.
Credibility Concerns
Some users question the credibility of the list, hinting at perceived biases and agendas by ESPN. The irony of certain rankings, such as Modric outranking Ronaldo Nazario, adds to the skepticism.
Overall, the community’s response to Murray’s ranking showcases a mix of admiration for his achievements and skepticism towards the criteria and validity of ESPN’s list. The debate highlights the subjective nature of athlete rankings, fueling passionate discussions and varied opinions within the sports community.